TECHNOLOGY: Making the most of mobiles

LONDON, 7 September 2011 (IRIN) – It is not often a technology guru will say, “Forget the internet!” but Ken Banks, founder of Kiwanja.net, advocates going back to basics – using mobile phones rather than the internet, and pretty basic phones at that.

While mobile phones are ubiquitous in Africa, the internet has nothing like the same penetration and is almost non-existent in rural areas. Says Banks: “For example, in Zimbabwe, there’s 2-3 percent internet penetration. If your amazing, whizzy mobile tool needs the internet, and you are looking to deploy it in Zimbabwe, you have lost 97 percent of people before you start.”

making the most of mobiles
Even the most basic mobile phones are able to use innovative tools

Dillon Dhanecha’s company, The Change Studio, was trying to distribute management tools and training through the internet, and admits it fell into exactly the trap Banks was describing. “We were developing short YouTube clips and so on, but I was in Rwanda a few weeks ago and trying to access our site from my Smartphone, and it just wasn’t happening.”

But there are plenty of options with even a not-very-smart phone: one of the pioneers was M-Pesa, designed as a tool for repaying microfinance loans. But Kenyans found all kinds of other uses; for instance, people afraid to carry large sums of cash while travelling would send it to themselves for collection at their destination. It was also key to the recent Kenyans for Kenya drought aid funding drive.

Tracking livestock

Another phone-based tool playing an important role in the drought-affected areas of East Africa is EpiCollect, developed by Imperial College, London, which allows the geospatial collation of data collected by mobile phone. Kenyan vets are using it for disease surveillance, monitoring outbreaks, treatments, vaccinations and animal deaths.

Even where there is no mobile-phone signal, they can record data by phone and store it until it can be transferred to a computer, producing an interactive map pinpointing where each observation has been made, with additional information about locality, even photographs, available at the click of a mouse.

Nick Short, of the NGO VetAid, has been greatly impressed by the possibilities, and the fact that ministries of agriculture and the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) can now track what is happening in real time.

“When I worked in Botswana,” he says, “We had an outbreak in the northwest of a disease called CBPP. It took us about two-and-a-half months to hear the disease was in the country. By the time we got there about 20,000 cows had died; we ended up killing 300,000 cattle.”

Short is also hoping its use during the current drought will help leverage assistance, helping potential donors pinpoint exactly where their money will be going. “Just watching the BBC is not good enough,” he says. “This way people will actually see the animals they are benefiting.”

Banks has developed an SMS-based tool, Frontline SMS, which will work with even the simplest phones. By connecting a standard mobile phone to a laptop, data can be received or transmitted wherever a basic phone signal is available, without any need for 3G or an internet connection. It is freely available to any not-for-profit organization.

In Afghanistan it has been used to send out security alerts to field workers. It tracks drug availability in clinics across East Africa, and house demolitions in Zimbabwe. Civil society groups in Nigeria have used it to collate information from their election observers, and it is used by a company distributing agricultural pumps in Kenya and Tanzania to keep in touch with farmers. Specialized versions are being developed for health and educational sectors, for NGOs working in law and microfinance, and for community radio stations.

Nay-sayers

But while the developers may be entranced by their tools, some dissenting voices were raised at the 1 September meeting in London. A Ghanaian lawyer, who declined to be named, said: “I find this depressing. Just monitoring is not sufficient; monitoring is just collecting data while people die.”

Short disagreed: “Without these tools no one knows what is happening in remote areas, and if you don’t know what is happening, you can’t do anything about it… If there were an outbreak of disease, we wouldn’t know about it until it was too late, and the animals were already dead.”

Shewa Adeniji, director of a small NGO called Flourish International, which sponsors community clinics in Ghana, expressed wider concerns about Africa’s love-affair with the mobile phone. “There are glaring benefits, but it’s adding to poverty on the ground. You have people in Nigeria struggling to pay 1,000 naira for medical insurance, and yet they will buy 1,000 naira top-up for their phones. These are misplaced priorities and meanwhile the telecom companies are going to African countries to milk them of their money.”

Banks accepted there had been cases of people buying phone credit rather than food or sending their children to school but pointed out that building a transmission network, especially in rural areas, costs money. “If mobile phone [companies] didn’t make money, we wouldn’t have the network of coverage we have. And once the network is there, people can use it… The technology can be used to do both good and bad, and you can’t really control that. You can just as easily spread a hate message as a health message, but you just have to hope that people will use it in a positive way.”

eb/mw
Theme (s): Aid Policy, Early Warning, Food Security, Health & Nutrition,
[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]
Source: http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=93675

Olonde Omondi – Dead River

Olonde Omondi

Title: Dead River
Medium: Acrylic on Paper
Size: A4
Price: USD 900

This image makes words about the environment in Kenya, or Africa as a whole, redundant.

So no words are here, other than those about the artist:

Omondi was born March of 1976 in Nyanza Province in the Western region of Kenya. The abundant black cotton soils of the area provided the basic material for his first form of expression as a child. In Nursery  School, this immediately translated itself into a love of drawing that still dominates him to date.

Leila Chirayath Janah: Ending Poverty in the Digital Age

Leila Chirayath Janah: Ending Poverty in the Digital Age from TEDx Silicon Valley on Vimeo.

Samasource enables marginalized people, from refugees in Kenya to women in rural Pakistan, to receive life-changing work opportunities via the Internet. In parallel, we enable socially responsible companies, small businesses, nonprofits, and entrepreneurs in the US to contribute to economic development by buying services from our workforce at fair prices. http://www.samasource.org

Courses

The Open University gives free access to Open University course materials on the OpenLearn website.
There are hundreds of free study units, each with a discussion forum.
The OU says, “Study independently at your own pace or join a group and use the free learning tools to work with others.”

Here are the  Units in Environment, Development and International Studies:

An introduction to sustainable energy (T206_2) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 3 Introductory RSS Feed for T206_2
Claiming connections: a distant world of sweatshops? (DD205_2) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 14 Intermediate RSS Feed for DD205_2
Climate change (U316_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 5 Intermediate RSS Feed for U316_1
Climate change (S250_3) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 18 Intermediate RSS Feed for S250_3
Climate change: island life in a volatile world (DD205_3) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 15 Intermediate RSS Feed for DD205_3
Developing countries in the world trade regime (DU321_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 8 Advanced RSS Feed for DU321_1
Earth’s physical resources: petroleum (S278_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 12 Intermediate RSS Feed for S278_1
Environment: Following the flows (U116_2) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 12 Introductory RSS Feed for U116_2
Environment: treading lightly on the Earth (U116_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 15 Introductory RSS Feed for U116_1
Global warming (E500_11) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 5 Introductory RSS Feed for E500_11
Health and environment (SK220_2) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 12 Introductory RSS Feed for SK220_2
Intergrated safety, health and environmental management: an introduction (T835_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 15 Masters RSS Feed for T835_1
Introducing international development management (TU870_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 40 Masters RSS Feed for TU870_1
Introducing the environment: ecology and ecosystems (Y161_2) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 5 Introductory RSS Feed for Y161_2
Living in a globalised world (DD205_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 12 Intermediate RSS Feed for DD205_1
Managing coastal environments (U216_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 3 Intermediate RSS Feed for U216_1
Nature matters: caring and accountability (TD866_2) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 15 Advanced RSS Feed for TD866_2
Nature matters in conversation (TD866_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 12 Advanced RSS Feed for TD866_1
Nature matters: systems thinking and experts (TD866_3) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 15 Advanced RSS Feed for TD866_3
Rights and justice in international relations (DU301_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 13 Advanced RSS Feed for DU301_1
Sustainable Scotland (T123_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 5 Introductory RSS Feed for T123_1
Why sustainable energy matters (T206_1) This unit allows guest users to enter Summary 9 Introductory RSS Feed for T206_1
Working with our environment – an introduction (T172_1)
The OpenLearn website gives free access to Open University course materials. This is the LearningSpace, where you’ll find hundreds of free study units, each with a discussion forum. Study independently at your own pace or join a group and use the free learning tools to work with others.

Save

GLOBAL: Millions wasted on shipping food aid


Photo: Chuck Simmins/Flickr
Aid has many hidden costs

JOHANNESBURG, 13 July 2010 (IRIN) – US taxpayers spend about US$140 million every year on non-emergency food aid in Africa, and roughly the same amount to ship food aid to global destinations on US vessels; money that could have been used to feed more people says a new study by researchers at Cornell University in the US.

The US Agency for International Development (USAID) has accounted for more than half of the world’s food aid every year for decades, but has been “the last and slowest donor to reform its food aid policies”, noted Christopher Barrett, a leading food aid expert, and his colleagues, Elizabeth Bageant and Erin Lentz.

Their study, Food Aid and Agricultural Cargo Preference, has come up with the numbers to back a long-standing call for reforms, and goes a step further in showing that the policy designed to “nurture” or subsidise the US shipping industry “under the guise of humanitarian assistance” is not doing either effectively.

Most donors have moved towards cash transfers or vouchers to buy food, instead of providing food as aid, but the paper points out that most countries only had agribusiness and some NGO interests to contend with while reforming their food aid policy.

Reforms in the US have faced much tougher opposition from “a uniquely effective lobby”, referred to as the “iron triangle”, comprising agribusiness, the shipping sector and some NGOs.

Barrett and Daniel Maxwell, an associate professor at Tufts University, Boston, in the US, who wrote at length about the “iron triangle” in their 2005 book, Food Aid After Fifty Years: Recasting Its Role, estimated that it cost more than two dollars of US taxpayers’ money to deliver one dollar’s worth of food procured as in-kind aid.

''If our objective is to generate US jobs, why do so through a humanitarian food aid programme, rather than focusing on generating jobs directly''

Little known shipping subsidy

Little has been written about the costs and effects of a policy called the Agricultural Cargo Preference (ACP), which affects the shipping sector of the “iron triangle”, and USAID, the world’s largest food aid programme.

The ACP requires that 75 percent of US food aid be shipped on privately owned, US registered vessels, even if they do not offer the most competitive rates. Some of these costs are reimbursed by the Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration, but ultimately the US taxpayer foots the entire bill.

The Cornell researchers used data available for every USAID food aid shipment in 2006, when ACP cost US taxpayers $140 million, “The amount paid above the regular cost of ocean freight on the competitive market,” said Barrett.

ACP was calculated by taking into account the costs of transporting the food aid on competing foreign vessels plying the same waters, after deducting the ACP costs borne by US Department of Agriculture food aid programmes, and reimbursements.

The un-reimbursed cost of ACP to food aid agencies was almost the same as what USAID spent on non-emergency food aid to Africa, which benefited 1.2 million people and was “widely deemed important to preventing food emergencies”. USAID declined to comment on the findings of the study, saying the research “spoke for itself”.

About 20 years ago the US Government Accountability Office (GAO), an independent investigative arm of Congress, looked at the costs of shipping food aid in US-flag vessels rather than using cheaper foreign ships, and estimated that it cost $150 million each year. Another report in 1994 put the cost as high as $200 million a year.
Failing shipping as well

The ACP was put in place to achieve four objectives: ensure that US vessels remained seaworthy and prepared should a war break out; maintain skilled jobs for American seafarers; maintain the financial viability of US ships; protect US ocean commerce from foreign domination.

Barrett, Bageant and Lentz found that “contrary to its national security and ‘buy American’ objectives”, ACP used vessels which were not useful to the military, and most of the vessels used were ultimately owned by foreign corporations.

They recommended that the US administration revisit the ACP, and suggested separating security objectives from humanitarian ones, with direct support for the Maritime Security Program.

But shipping industry says

The US shipping industry, which produced its own study – Impacts on the US Economy of Shipping International Food Aid – around the same time as the Cornell researchers, argues that eliminating the ACP would shrink the US-flag merchant fleet by 15 percent to 30 percent, with the loss of between 16,500 and 33,000 jobs.

Barrett said the shipping industry’s study had used “very crude multipliers not developed for this application, and seem to use the total ocean freight costs, not the marginal cost of cargo preference, thereby assuming that every maritime job would disappear. That’s a highly questionable assumption that they then inflate, using highly questionable multipliers”.

The Cornell study’s calculations showed that US taxpayers were paying a subsidy of almost $100,000 every year per mariner on an ACP vessel shipping food aid. “That’s a pretty handsome subsidy,” he commented.

“One would hope there would be some economic multiplier. The question is whether that’s the best use of those funds, if our objective is to generate US jobs; and if the objective is to generate US jobs, why do so through a humanitarian food aid programme, rather than focusing on generating jobs directly?”

Copyright © IRIN 2010. All rights reserved.