Planet Links

PLANET LINKS COMPANY

Environmental Concern

“Environmental Concern”

P.O BOX 60 031 – 002, NAIROBI – KENYA, EMAIL:  planetlinksgoc@gmail.com

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANCY FIRM

COMPANY PROFILE

CONTACT: JOHN NDWIGA, +254 720 322 187, +254 20 214 93 39, jndwiga2000@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ABOUT US

Planet Links Company is an environmental consultancy firm covering, but not limited to, matters relating to and affecting the environment.
The firm has a wide range of professionals who have a good mastery of environmental issues and are always ready to offer professional environmental consultancy services.

 

CONSULTANCY SERVICES

1. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Auditing (EA)

This is done in accordance with the requirements of Section 58 of the Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act of 1999 (EMCA); Section 31 of the Environmental (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations of 2003; section 36 of the Physical Planning Act of 1996, and any other relevant provision of the laws of Kenya. Planet Links Company has highly qualified personnel who have a profound knowledge of Environmental Impact Assessments and Environmental Audits.

2. Biodiversity Conservation

Planet Links Company deals with biodiversity conservation. This involves natural terrestrial and aquatic flora and fauna. Sustainable approaches are adopted through extensive consultation with the relevant stakeholders. Local communities are always encouraged to take centre stage in the conservation of the various resources and equipped with knowledge of balancing their needs from the resources as well as ensuring that the ecosystem is not adversely affected.

Planet Links Company also develops Environmental Restoration Programs with respect to any degraded areas, for instance Wetlands, Rivers, Forests and the like.

3. Industrial and Urban Waste Management

Planet Links Company offers consultancy services on Waste Management. This is on the collection, storage, transportation, processing, treatment, recycling and final disposal of waste. The systems adopted are simple, affordable, sustainable (financially, environmentally and socially) and are equitable, providing collection services to poor as well as wealthy households. This is with the aim of improving the environment and involving formal door-to-door collection systems. A thorough situational analysis in strategic waste management is done on the existing situation and systems and relevant advice and approach is offered.

4. Renewable Energy

 

Planet Links Company aims at encouraging the adoption of renewable energy systems in the urban and rural areas. With the limited natural resources and the ever growing demand for energy, strategic plans need to be adopted. Solar, Wind and Water energies are our key concerns in the quest for renewable energy. Most parts of the country are endowed with either of the above resources if not all. Planet Links Company, in collaboration with the local communities, NGOs, Coporates and the Government advocates and advices on the suitable renewable energy to be adopted.

5. Fisheries and Aquaculture Management

 

Planet Links Company has the expertise to conduct large scale and small scale aquaculture projects. This involves open ponds, backyard ponds and aquariums. Consultancy involves pond construction and the type of fish to rear depending on the environmental conditions. Different types of fish farming are advised with respect to clients needs. The clients are equipped with knowledge of sustaining aquaculture as source of revenue. Fish farming projects are carried out whether for commercial or aesthetic purposes.

Save

Save

Sawdust with Brains

The Kisangani Smith Group has developed two types of efficient biomass stoves, which can be fabricated by local smiths. One stove is targeted at charcoal and replaces the widespread use of charcoal in towns. This stove burns sawdust, which is readily available as waste in the Njombe region of Tanzania, or agricultural residues. The other stove is an improved woodburner, designed for rural areas. The Kisangani Smith Group and its trainees have sold over 3,500 stoves so far.
Here’s their video:

Why Women are Better Conservationists

It is the simple things that matter most

Through their unconscious actions, Women conserve the most important resources needed for sustainable development – forests, energy and water.

In my words, without putting natural resources in the picture, to conserve is to use frugally and cautiously. I’m saying today that women are much better at “using frugally and cautiously” natural capital, as compared to their male counterparts. In this case, conservation is the “wise use of natural resources.”

We use various natural resources on a daily basis, starting from food to the air we breathe. However, I will use the other resources that we put to use on daily basis at our homes, and have much more control over their use; water, electric energy and wood fuel. I’ll let you think about any other.

On average, men use more water that women in every activity that they undertake involving use of this resource. For drinking purposes, men are advised to drink three litres of water a day compared to women’s 2.2 litres. Even a pregnant woman is supposed to take just 2.4 litres a day, until they bare the child when they can increase intake to 3 litres (For your information, too much water is bad for your health). Now, whether we follow this advice or not, the fact is that generally men take more water than women.

Secondly, while a woman can comfortably use five litres of water to bathe, that is enough for a man’s head only. On average, men use more than ten litres of water when bathing, irrespective of their body sizes.

Think about this as well; given that a man is in the right mood to assist in the kitchen, especially with washing utensils, how much water would he use to wash five plates and five glasses plus a few forks? My answer is, whether under running tap or not, a man in the right mood of doing this chore would use much more water than a woman would.

It is the difference in these amounts that I call conserved water.

I do not want to go to figure facts about how much hydro-electric power we produce in our country, and how little this is to sustain all national requirements. What you need to know however, is that the current population size of people connected to electricity is a meager 20 percent – just about 7.5million of the 38million Kenyans- albeit insufficiently.

With all the rationing, you’d expect the figure to be somewhere at 70 percent! Now, women have proved to be better users of electricity.

It is the simple things that matter most; switching off lights in unoccupied rooms, switching off unused power sockets and unplugging unused gadgets. A man will leave his radio or television on while going to the market thinking that they won’t take long, but a woman will switch off everything. While cooking or ironing, a woman will most likely be more cautious not to leave the flat iron heating or food to burn on the cooker. You know this is waste of energy. And don’t tell me about society-roles-advantage here.

Over 90 percent of Kenyan households use wood fuel for various purposes. This is directly proportional to the extent of forest destruction in the country. Still, women have shown to be more conservative of the forests. I will not tell you that they use less firewood in cooking than men, not at all. I am thinking of a scenario where two people, a man and a woman have a task of going onto the forest to look for firewood.

Most likely, the man will carry an axe, but the woman will carry a machete/panga. It most likely is due to their physical abilities that when you watch these two people coming back home, one will be carrying/pulling almost a whole tree where as the other will be carrying smaller tree branches. The one who cut off small branches is the better conservationist.

I know what the man is thinking now; that women don’t do these things while thinking of conservation. I did not say they do. But through their unconscious actions, they conserve the most important resources needed for sustainable development – forests, energy and water.

The conserved forests aid in rain formation. Rain brings water and the conserved forests act as water catchment areas. They become the sources of the streams and rivers that supply us with water for our daily use. When the water reaches our homes, the women use it much more frugally, and enable other people to get their share as well.

It is the same waters from the forested catchment areas that are used to produce electricity, and women use this electricity better than men. Once again, it doesn’t matter whether they switch off all unused electric gadgets and sockets because they fear electricity-related accidents. The fact is that they end up conserving natural resources, and the challenge to men is whether they can do better.

Originally published at SmartBizAfrica

Bees to Monitor Pollution

German airports are employing bees to check their environmental impact. Beekeepers in Germany near airports are having their honey tested for toxins. All these unpaid bee workers have, in essence, reported back that there is not a significant problem with air quality, compared with other zones.

© Ichtor | Dreamstime.com

At Dusseldorf International Airport, the bees have reported that their honey exhibits the same toxin levels as those in a non-industrial area and better still, the honey is given away under the name of Dusseldorf Natural.

The usual main pollutants are nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and PM10, PM2.5 (small particulates). So how does this relate to Kenya? The answer could be supplied by Dr. Linsey C. Marr at Virginia Tech. Dr Marr has found that the running times in marathons are more affected by air pollutants  in the case of women than in the case of men. Dr. Marr reported:  “Although pollution levels in these marathons rarely exceeded national standards for air quality, performance was still affected.” And marathon performances? Now, they certainly are important.

Some of this information was originally reported in the New York Times.

Solar Sisters: The Avon Lady of African Renewables

Alex Aylett, 2 Jun 10

Solar Sisters, a new solar entrepreneur program, has taken Avon’s social sales model and is using it to spread solar powered lamps across Uganda. Avon cosmetics began as a failed 19th century book-selling venture. Its “Avon Calling” approach, where saleswomen sold directly to other women, helped it grow into one of the 500 largest companies in the United States with annual global revenues of over US$10 billion.

Both energy and cosmetics have a lot to do with gender.Solar Sisters — like the Barefoot Solar Engineers that I’ve written about earlier — uses the special place that women have as procurers and managers of fuel use to take on the social, environmental and economic impacts of energy poverty.

In the developing world women are primarily responsible for gathering, purchasing and using household energy: wood, coal, kerosene or gas. Smoke from using these fuels indoors causes serious long term health problems. Poor households also spend a greater percentage of their income on energy than wealthier ones, and are charged more for energy. This unreliable and costly access to energy, especially electricity, is one of the key factors that drives migration from rural and semi-rural areas to expanding cities.

Now starting their first pilot projects, Solar Sisters approach to these issues is relatively simple: they sell two different models of solar lamps (a basic model, and a larger one that also recharges cellphones). The lamps can replace both kerosene lights and long trips into urban areas to get phones recharged. In a recent ChangeMakers article, Katherine Lucey, former banker and founder of Solar Sisters, explains the multiple benefits of the lamps:

“With solar, they don’t have to breathe in tadooba toxic fumes. When they look at the black walls of their house, they realize that if the walls are black, the inside of their lungs are black…Economically, it makes sense because within two months, they they’ll recover the cost of having to buy kerosene. This immediately frees up 20 percent of their income.”

Last year, Oxford business professor Linda Scott argued that the Avon model might even be better then microfinance when if comes to lifting women out of poverty. Initial results from research that she has been doing in South Africa show it to be more accessible than microcredit and well suited to dynamics of local communities.

Whether lessons learned from lipstick in South Africa will hold true for solar lamps in Uganda is an open question. But Lucey claims that for the female entrepreneurs working for Solar Sisters, the lamps offer a rare economic opportunity and can bring in up to US$450 a year. Solar Sisters covers the upfront costs of the women’s first solar light inventory, and they then use their earnings to purchase more inventory.

The biggest hurdle may be the price of the lamps themselves. The two models sell for US$15 and US$45. That may simply be out of reach for many families. The Solar Sisters blog discusses one community that came up with a way of collectively financing their purchases (something also done for livestock and other larger purchases).

In an interview, Lucey talks about the difficulty of convincing women to think of the lanterns as a long-term investment. It is about more than a change in thinking though. The same factors that stop women from saving money by purchasing larger quantities of kerosene or coal also apply to solar. A lack of savings, unpredictable finances and in some cases concerns over theft steer women to purchase energy (and many other daily commodities like rice and oil) in small amounts.

Solar Sisters is a promising project – and the image of solar “Avon Ladies” spreading across Africa is hard to resist. Solar Sisters is addressing the same issues as the impressive Indian Barefoot Solar Engineer program. That program’s success depended both on a clear understanding of women’s roles as energy managers and on a smart approach to financing. That second part seems to be the one thing missing from the Solar Sisters project. Before Solar Sisters really takes off, I have a feeling that they will take the lessons learned from their early clients’ community financing arrangements and build them directly into their business model.

This post originally appeared on Alex’s blog Open Alex.
Alex Aylett is a Senior Research Associate at the International Centre for Sustainable Cities and a PhD student at the University of British Columbia. He is the recipient of a Trudeau Research Scholarship and has worked as a consultant and researcher in North America and South Africa. He is currently based in Montreal. You can read his blog here.
Images from Avon and Solar Sisters.